Camus’ philosophical rejection of religion in “The Stranger” and “The Plague” Custom Essay
Introduction Albert Camus is one of the few people in the world who have a number of tiles to his name. He was journalist, a Nobel peace prize holder an award winning author. He was also described by others who knew him as a philosopher although he refused to accept the last title. However, the stance he took on various issues providing and the kind of arguments he advanced throughout could be seen to have philosophical angle. There are various issues that Albert discussed and took a standpoint on. His views o various issues would elicit different reactions and some of these views would bring changes. One of the issues that he strongly spoke about and against was religion. As an author, he used his books to develop his ideologies. The argument on religion was well advanced in two of his books The Stranger and The Plague. His arguments were not always straightforward and would sometimes be confusing. This is because his arguments were not necessarily either or. His justification and foundation of his argument always had philosophical backing. One aspect that came out clear is that he rejected religion and its canons. He did so philosophically provided backing to his argument and assertion. This discussion takes focus on the justification he provided on his strong rejection of religion.